ꠟꠅꠀ require
Provenance
- #13 dataflow concept_map maps ruby/require → concept require
- #28 sealion-refinement concept_map maps ruby/require → concept require winning layer
Full per-leaf change history across brain builds is not yet recorded; shown is the current build's layer stack.
Across locales
What each covering migration carries for this concept, per locale — the whole-brain view, not filtered by your language. Forms are the migration's leaf values (pre-transform, pre-human-verdict); a locale without a form falls back to canonical English. Chips open that locale's live docs page for this term.
dataflow · concept require — per-locale forms
Expand to load the per-locale matrix.
sealion-refinement · concept require — per-locale forms
Expand to load the per-locale matrix.
AI council review
Reviewed by 1 model
· @cf/aisingapore/gemma-sea-lion-v4-27b-it · 2026-07-17
Cluster dataflow
· locale syl-Sylo
· member require
Suggesting 'bebhar loa' (use and take). This attempts to capture the idea of needing something *in order to use it*. It's not perfect, but better than just 'loa'. A more ideal solution might require coining a new term if the language lacks a direct equivalent.
Issue breakdown
- accuracy While 'loa' (to take/accept) isn't *incorrect*, it's weak for 'require'. 'Require' implies a dependency or necessity, which 'loa' doesn't strongly convey.
- specificity Too general. 'Require' is more than just 'accepting' something; it's needing it for functionality.
- consistency Collapsing with 'receive' loses nuance. 'Require' is a more active operation.